Audit Scenarios/CapEx vs OpEx Classification
CapEx vs OpEx Classification Audit Trail
Every expenditure classification your AI agent makes: logged against your versioned capitalization policy, cryptographically attested, and independently verifiable.
The problem
Misclassifying operating expenses as capital expenditures inflates reported assets and understates expenses. It is one of the most common financial statement audit findings and a known fraud pattern. The PCAOB specifically tests capitalization controls during SOX audits.
When an AI agent applies your capitalization policy at scale, auditors need evidence that each classification was tied to the policy in effect at decision time, that material items received human oversight, and that reclassifications are tracked immutably.
Policy versioning
Every classification decision is tied to the policy version in effect at the time. When your capitalization policy changes, a new version is inserted in the immutable policy registry. Old versions are never modified. Auditors can verify which policy applied to any given decision, including threshold amounts and materiality limits.
Material decisions
Classification decisions above your materiality threshold automatically require human approval before any downstream accounting entry executes. That approval is logged immutably. Potential misclassifications, such as classifying material CapEx as OpEx when the amount exceeds the capitalization threshold, are flagged for review regardless of agent state.
Integration
Reference standards: ASC 350 (internal-use software), ASC 360 (property, plant, and equipment). Attestation verification strings use SIGMODX-CAPEX-[ORG]-[HASH] at /verify.
Available for Q4 2026 pilot
CapEx classification scenario is live in repo. Pilot access for enterprise teams evaluating SOX capitalization controls.
Request pilot access →